Participant one and two both have a great deal of respect for me, it is my belief that during the interview that they will see me as their coach and confidant just like they do every single day. As long as I do not use anything that they tell me against them as a personal attack, I am certain that my relationship with both participants will remain exactly the same. Before the interview I will explain to all participants exactly what it is that I am doing. The will know that they are expected to answer each question as best as they can. I want them to look at me for that 45 min interviewer as a "researcher" and not as their coach. Setting up the guidelines early will help with that expectation.
In order to get the most out of my participants, its important for me to tell them exactly what I ma doing for the study and well as why I am doing it. The more that my participants know about me and why i have chosen this topic the better. I will give all of my participants the option of being anonymous, if any of them should so choose to not have their name used then they will be given an alias. Because I know both participants really well, I know they will not have an issue with their names being used in the course of the research.
I believe that this project is very cut and dry. At the moment I do not see any problem and ethical issues arising at any point in time. In the event either of these issues does come up, I will be forced to stop my interview and proceed once both the participant and I are comfortable with the new direction things are headed.
I have set a goal to be done with this project by November 1st...
Chris McMillian